In Matt Segal’s great article ‘Evolution and the Within of Things’ he makes at least one small but important error.“It was not until the 20th century that our species began to gain the level of self-reflection necessary to truly begin a study of the psyche.” Hmm. This demonstrates the limitations of modern empiricism and positivism which I want to look at a bit here, as well as the outer reaches of evolving Western science and philosophy. It’s possible that Segal, in an ironic reflection of his own subject matter; that of trying to grasp the unknowable through scientific methods of analysis, has slipped nicely through a black hole in his own Western mindset…Segal’s 20th century will have to answer to aeons of great prophets, saints, mystics and whole civilisations on their ‘level of self-reflection’ and ‘study of the psyche’. In his article he writes,” Pierre Teilhard invented the term Omega Point as representing, “the momentary summit of an anthropogenesis which is itself the crown of a cosmogenesis” The human being, rather than an anomaly, represents the pinnacle and purpose of evolution itself. This realisation is a radical shift away from the “science of man as marginal to the universe”, where “the scientist himself stands apart from the objects of science”
In 1971, John David Garcia explained the constant increase of ethics is essential for humankind to reach the Omega Point. He applied the term creativity to the combination of intelligence and ethics and announced that increasing creativity is the correct and proper goal of human life.
Ok, Teilhard and Garcia are onto something. But the futility of trying to prove the unknowable is clear.
"Don't try and see through the distances, that's not for human beings” - Jalalludin Rumi
'Trying' in the sense of methodically analysing 'the distances', is the way of the positivist-scientist-philosopher who 'stands apart from the objects of his science' though again, 20th century Scientists such as Jung experienced a type of evolutionary becoming: “At times I feel as if I am spread out over the landscape and inside things, and am myself living in every tree, in the splashing of the waves, in the clouds and the animals that come and go, in the procession of the seasons”. (Memories, Dreams, Reflections).
Conversely, 'trying' in the case of conscious effort incorporating a 'synthesised' view of the universe (eg. with the inner, human conviction of sound belief and the best available methodology) is applied in Sufism in order to instigate the full evolutionary process of becoming and Being; 'human beings' become Being. Inner knowledge dimensions within Rumi's phrases are there to be uncovered and revealed.
Back on the topic of creativity I think the sufi ‘An’ moment is extremely interesting:
“I have also come to believe that the creative moment in scientists, founders of religions, artists and original thinkers, all appear when the intellect has exhausted itself… In such a state and suddenly at a moment when the psyche has regained its total harmony and is free from internal conflict, then instantly an original vision appears. That moment is An” – A Reza Arasteh in Growth to Selfhood; the Sufi Contribution. Arasteh also explains that the sufi view of the human psyche is that it is an ocean that contains all beings and things – the moment of An is akin to a fish appearing on the surface then disappearing again. Carl Rogers called this is-ness. It is also the same as step 3 in Wallas’ The Art of Thought'.
Is science exhausted and about to enter a collective moment of An? For example, we see the desperate situation of Postmodernist philosophy
“Post-modernism is arguably the most depressing philosophy ever to spring from the western mind. It is difficult to talk about post-modernism because nobody really understands it. It’s allusive to the point of being impossible to articulate. But what this philosophy basically says is that we’ve reached an endpoint in human history. That the modernist tradition of progress and ceaseless extension of the frontiers of innovation are now dead. Originality is dead. The avant-garde artistic tradition is dead. All religions and utopian visions are dead and resistance to the status quo is impossible because revolution too is now dead. Like it or not, we humans are stuck in a permanent crisis of meaning, a dark room from which we can never escape”. – Kalle Lasn
More bites from Segal’s essay -
Teilhard points out how in “breaking down synthesis after synthesis… science leaves us “confronted with a pile of dismantled machinery and evanescent particles” and invites us “to discover the universal hidden beneath the exceptional”. By this he means that human consciousness, rather than a fluke, is actually the leading edge of a billion year process rushing toward its final consummation…. This is a view of humanity as “the key of the universe” Jung writes that the Self “cannot be distinguished empirically from a God-image” Teilhard is here trying to show us the significance of the current moment of evolution, as human beings begin to become conscious of evolution’s trajectory. This process of waking up—of coming to see—represents the moment when the within and the without cross paths to produce a point of infinite radiance. Once we have come to see the “inner face of the world” by feeling the “presence of the Absolute (the Self),” the synchronistic Omega Point is upon us.
“In that event the subjective viewpoint coincides with the way things are distributed objectively, and perception reaches its apogee. The landscape lights up and yields its secrets. [We] see.”
Does Matt Segal need help in ‘seeing through the distances’? I do.